Is the Jesuit Order Jewish?
Has Judaism Taken Over the Catholic Church?
Are Jews to Blame For All Our Problems?
Who Controls the New World Order?
This was an interview between Texe Marrs and Edward Hendrie. Edward Hendrie by his own confession (18:00) is a graduate from Notre Dame and earned another degree from a Jesuit law school!
During this debate I became nauseous at how obvious it is that these men are disinformation agents to divert the few Protestants left into chaos.
At the 3:00 mark Hendrie says,
“The Roman Catholic Church is a Crypto Jewish…it is a concealed Jewish Religion…their doctrines however are Jewish…and in essence they are Babylonian because Judaism flows from Babylon…it makes up the pillars of the Roman Catholic Church”.
All my readers know how absolutely ridiculous this is. I have been focusing on this issue for many years. The Roman Catholic religion is a calculated rejection of everything Jewish.
The Synod of Laodicea. Canon XXIX states,
“Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.”
Medieval Sourcebook: Professions of Faith Extracted from Jews on Baptism says,
“To our most merciful and tranquil lord Recceswinth the King [Visigoth king in the 7th century], from us the Jews of Toledo as witnessed or signed below. We well remember how we were long and rightly constrained to sign this Declaration promising in the name of King Chinthila’s holy memory to support the Catholic faith; and we have done so. However, because our pertinacious lack of faith and the ancient errors of our fathers held us back from believing wholly in Our Lord Jesus Christ or accepting the Catholic truth with all our hearts, we therefore make these promises to your greater glory, on behalf both of ourselves and our wives and children, through this our Declaration, undertaking for the future not to become involved in any Jewish rites or customs nor to associate with the accursed Jews who remain unbaptised. We will not follow our habit of contracting incestuous unions or practising fornication with our own relatives to the sixth degree. We will not on any pretext, either ourselves, our children or our descendants, choose wives from our own race; but in the case of both sexes we will always link ourselves in matrimony with Christians. We will not practise carnal circumcision, or celebrate the Passover, the Sabbath or the other feast days connected with the Jewish religion. We will not keep to our old habit of discrimination in the matter of food. We will do none of the things which the evil tradition of long custom and intercourse urges upon us as Jews. Instead , with utter faith and grace in our hearts, and with complete devotion towards Christ the Son of the Living God, as the apostolic tradition enjoins, shall we believe on Him and confess Him. Every custom of the holy Christian religion, feast days, marriage, and what is lawful to eat, indeed every ceremony thereof, we shall faithfully hold and embrace with all our hearts, reserving no hint within ourselves of resistance, no suspicion of deception, whereby we may come to repeat those errors we now deny, or fulfil with little or no sincerity that which we now promise to do. With regard to swines’ flesh we promise to observe this rule, that if through long custom we are hardly able to eat it, we shall not through fastidiousness or error refuse the things that are cooked with it. And if in all the matters touched on above we are found in any way to transgress, either presuming to work against the Christian Faith, or promising in words to perform actions suitable to the Catholic religion, and in our deeds deferring their performance, we swear by that same Father, Son and Holy Ghost, who is One God in Three, that whoever of us is found to transgress shall either perish by the hands of our fellows, by burning or stoning, or if your splendid piety shall have spared our lives, we shall at once lose our liberty and you shall give us along with all our property to whomever you please into perpetual slavery, or dispose of us in any other manner that seems good to you. To this end you have free authority, not only on account of your royal power, but also arising out of the stipulations of this our guarantee. This Declaration is given at Toledo in the name of the Lord, on the 18th of February in the sixth year of your glorious reign…
‘I renounce all customs, rites, legalisms, unleavened breads and sacrifices of lambs of the Hebrews, and all the other feasts of the Hebrews, sacrifices, prayers, aspersions, purifications, sanctifications and propitiations, and fasts, and new moons, and Sabbaths, and superstitions, and hymns and chants and observances and synagogues, and the food and drink of the Hebrews; in one word, I renounce absolutely everything Jewish.”
Notice that the aversion is to the Torah, not to the Talmud or to the Cabbala. These documents equate the Torah, not the Talmud or the Cabbala with Jewishness. So, the doctrine of the Catholic Church, so far from being Jewish, is a calculated rejection of the Jewish people and the Torah. This was accomplished through replacement theology.
COCC = Catechism of the Catholic Church:
COCC 751 The word “Church” (Latin ecclesia, from the Greek ek-ka-lein, to “call out of”) means a convocation or an assembly. It designates the assemblies of the people, usually for a religious purpose.139 Ekklesia is used frequently in the Greek Old Testament for the assembly of the Chosen People before God, above all for their assembly on Mount Sinai where Israel received the Law and was established by God as his holy people.140By calling itself “Church,” the first community of Christian believers recognized itself as heir to that assembly. In the Church, God is “calling together” his people from all the ends of the earth. The equivalent Greek term Kyriake, from which the English word Church and the German Kirche are derived, means “what belongs to the Lord.”
This is the way the Torah was explained in Christian Churches both Catholic and Protestant for centuries:
“COCC 577 At the beginning of the Sermon on the Mount Jesus issued a solemn warning in which he presented God’s law, given on Sinai during the first covenant, in light of the grace of the New Covenant:
Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets: I have come not to abolish but to fulfil. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law, until all is accomplished. Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, will be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.329
COCC 578 Jesus, Israel’s Messiah and therefore the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, was to fulfil the Law by keeping it in its all embracing detail – according to his own words, down to “the least of these commandments”.330 He is in fact the only one who could keep it perfectly.331 On their own admission the Jews were never able to observe the Law in its entirety without violating the least of its precepts.332This is why every year on the Day of Atonement the children of Israel ask God’s forgiveness for their transgressions of the Law. the Law indeed makes up one inseparable whole, and St. James recalls, “Whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it.”333
COCC 1962 The Old Law is the first stage of revealed Law. Its moral prescriptions are summed up in the Ten Commandments. the precepts of the Decalogue lay the foundations for the vocation of man fashioned in the image of God; they prohibit what is contrary to the love of God and neighbor and prescribe what is essential to it. The Decalogue is a light offered to the conscience of every man to make God’s call and ways known to him and to protect him against evil:
God wrote on the tables of the Law what men did not read in their hearts.13”
This is all a game though because the Sabbath is not kept in this Church and the name of Yahovah is not spoken by its people. So they believe neither the third nor the fourth commandments. Also, the law was kept. Luk 1:6.
However, the Catholic Church would invent another arbitrary category of law in order to justify their disobedience to most of the Bible: ceremonial law.
COCC 582 Going even further, Jesus perfects the dietary law, so important in Jewish daily life, by revealing its pedagogical meaning through a divine interpretation: “Whatever goes into a man from outside cannot defile him. . . (Thus he declared all foods clean.). . . What comes out of a man is what defiles a man. For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts. . .”346 In presenting with divine authority the definitive interpretation of the Law, Jesus found himself confronted by certain teachers of the Law who did not accept his interpretation of the Law, guaranteed though it was by the divine signs that accompanied it.347 This was the case especially with the sabbath laws, for he recalls, often with rabbinical arguments, that the sabbath rest is not violated by serving God and neighbour,348 which his own healings did.
This phrase “Thus he declared all foods clean” is not in the bible.
Notice the italicized words here. The argument is that καθαρίζων must mean “He declared” clean due to its masculine construction instead of neuter. The Christian is relying on a textual variant. The problem is, the way the Christian translates the passage the word καθαρίζων must be considered an adjective, but the word is a verb. Cleansing and declared clean are very different uses of the word clean. The former is a verb, the latter is an adjective while declared is the verb. Also take into account the cross reference in Mat 15:17 and the curious absence of the statement, “Thus he declared he declared all foods clean”.
This proves that the modern nominal Protestants are still in a partial league with the Roman Church. I say this having endured years of emotionally excruciating study: This is why the Reformation failed.
COCC 2174 Jesus rose from the dead “on the first day of the week.”104 Because it is the “first day,” the day of Christ’s Resurrection recalls the first creation. Because it is the “eighth day” following the sabbath,105 it symbolizes the new creation ushered in by Christ’s Resurrection. For Christians it has become the first of all days, the first of all feasts, the Lord’s Day (he kuriake hemera, dies dominica) Sunday:
We all gather on the day of the sun, for it is the first day [after the Jewish sabbath, but also the first day] when God, separating matter from darkness, made the world; and on this same day Jesus Christ our Savior rose from the dead.106
First of all, he did not rise from the dead on the first day of the week. The preparation day on which Messiah died was related to the Passover not the weekly Sabbath; thus it was not Friday.( John 19:14-15) Secondly, the only passage that seems to state (though the wording is not clear) that Messiah rose from the dead on Sunday is Mark 16:9. However, this passage is not in the oldest Greek text Codex Sinaiticus. The fact is, Messiah stated clearly that he would be in the grave 3 days and 3 nights. Mat. 12:40. This is impossible with the Friday to Sunday view of the heretical Christian Church. Secondly, the sun worship is clearly stated which has served as the basis for the Solar calendars of Christianity who so ridiculously state that the sun is in the center of the universe and that the earth revolves around the sun directly contrary to Psalm 93:1.
COCC 2175 Sunday is expressly distinguished from the sabbath which it follows chronologically every week; for Christians its ceremonial observance replaces that of the sabbath. In Christ’s Passover, Sunday fulfills the spiritual truth of the Jewish sabbath and announces man’s eternal rest in God. For worship under the Law prepared for the mystery of Christ, and what was done there prefigured some aspects of Christ:107
Those who lived according to the old order of things have come to a new hope, no longer keeping the sabbath, but the Lord’s Day, in which our life is blessed by him and by his death.108
2176 The celebration of Sunday observes the moral commandment inscribed by nature in the human heart to render to God an outward, visible, public, and regular worship “as a sign of his universal beneficence to all.”109 Sunday worship fulfills the moral command of the Old Covenant, taking up its rhythm and spirit in the weekly celebration of the Creator and Redeemer of his people”
2177 The Sunday celebration of the Lord’s Day and his Eucharist is at the heart of the Church’s life. “Sunday is the day on which the paschal mystery is celebrated in light of the apostolic tradition and is to be observed as the foremost holy day of obligation in the universal Church.”110
“Also to be observed are the day of the Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Ascension of Christ,
the feast of the Body and Blood of Christi,
the feast of Mary the Mother of God,
her Immaculate Conception,
the feast of Saint Joseph,
the feast of the Apostles Saints Peter and Paul, and the feast of All Saints.”111
COCC 1339 Jesus chose the time of Passover to fulfill what he had announced at Capernaum: giving his disciples his Body and his Blood:
Then came the day of Unleavened Bread, on which the passover lamb had to be sacrificed. So Jesus sent Peter and John, saying, “Go and prepare the passover meal for us, that we may eat it….” They went … and prepared the passover. and when the hour came, he sat at table, and the apostles with him. and he said to them, “I have earnestly desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer; for I tell you I shall not eat it again until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.”…. and he took bread, and when he had given thanks he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” and likewise the cup after supper, saying, “This cup which is poured out for you is the New Covenant in my blood.”164
1340 By celebrating the Last Supper with his apostles in the course of the Passover meal, Jesus gave the Jewish Passover its definitive meaning. Jesus’ passing over to his father by his death and Resurrection, the new Passover, is anticipated in the Supper and celebrated in the Eucharist, which fulfills the Jewish Passover and anticipates the final Passover of the Church in the glory of the kingdom.
So here we see the Catholic church doing everything it can, not to adopt the Jewish faith, but to replace it with its own Greco-Roman inventions. The Nation of Israel will be replaced by the Church. The Hebrew Gospels and the Hebrew writings of Paul, (which is admitted by The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis.Nazoraeans, 29. Against Nazoraeans 9,4; Eusebius, Church History, Book III, Chapter 24, 6; Chapter 38, 2; Chapter 39, 16; Book V, Chapter 10, 3; Book VI, Chapter 14, 2; and Jerome, Lives of Illustrious Men, Chapters III and V) will be replaced by Greek Manuscripts. The Semi-Arian Unitarianism of the Tanach will be replaced by the pagan Triune Godhead of Christianity which ultimately worships a monad huperousia pursuant to Plotinus’ Enneads. Following from this the Hebrew names of the creator and the messiah, Yahovah and Yehoshuwah will be replaced by a Generic title: God, and the Greek deity Iasus later to be translated Jesus. The Torah and all the hundreds of relational, political and economic laws revealed by Yahovah himself will be replaced by Pagan Monasticism, Asceticism, Canon Law and Feudalism. The Sabbath day which was sanctified and blessed by Yahovah in the second chapter of the Bible as an integral part of the created order, will be replaced by the day of the Sun. The annual Sabbaths of the fall and spring feasts will be replaced by the Catholic Church’s liturgical calendar, celebrating the Bohemian pagan Christmas, the Epiphany, the Ascension of Christ, the feast of the Body and Blood of Christi, the feast of Mary the Mother of God, her Immaculate Conception, her Assumption, the feast of Saint Joseph, the feast of the Apostles Saints Peter and Paul, and the feast of All Saints which is known today as the pagan celebration of Halloween, etc. The modern nominal Protestants, following Rome’s Replacement theology would still replace these feasts with their innovation known as The Lord’s Supper. Following from this, the creator’s calendar, which measures years by the Flat earth geocentric cosmology, the ripe barley, the abib, will be replaced by the Solar Calendars of Christianity and Jesuit Heliocentrism. This religion would go on to justify prayer and worship to idols and statues and trinkets and a legion of other grotesque and abominable insanities explicitly condemned in the Torah.
Truly in one word this religion would renounce absolutely everything Jewish.
For this man to even begin to claim that the Catholic Church derived their religion from Judaism is so heinous, so dark and malicious a deceit as to belie reason.
And to any Protestant Christians looking on, in order to believe the Jewish Hebrew Bible and the Jewish Hebrew Messiah you cannot be Christian. As we have seen, all Christian thinking operates off of Rome’s Replacement Theology. The Protestants in the Augsburg Confession actually admit some of this.
The Council of Trent was dominated by Jesuit influence. As the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia states,
“Paul III became an enthusiastic admirer of the new society. He chose three Jesuits, Lainez, Salmerón, and Lefévre as sole papal theologians to the Council of Trent. The latter died in Rome before the council began its sessions. Lainez and Salmerón* were joined by two other Jesuits at Trent, Le Jaye who represented the Bishop of Augsburg, and Covillon the theologian to the Duke of Bavaria.”
As the same article admits Lainez was an ethnic Jew:
Second general of the Society of Jesus, theologian, b. in 1512, at Almazan, Castille, in 1512; d. at Rome, 19 January, 1565. His family, although Christian for many generations, had descended from Jewish stock, as has been established by Sacchini (Historia Societatis Jesu, II, sec. 32).
According to the Roman Catholic Council of Trent’s 17th session, the Protestant Reformation was being seriously considered until the speech by Gaspard Del Fosso, Archbishop Reggio pointed out that the Church’s change of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday and its replacement of circumcision by Baptism was indicative of her authority over the scripture. (History of the Council of Trent by Félix Bungener, pg. 298.) The Augsburg Confession repeats this Roman Catholic argument in Article XXVIII: Of Ecclesiastical Power,
“They [The Roman Catholics-DS] refer to the Sabbath-day as having been changed into the Lord’s Day, contrary to the Decalog, as it seems. Neither is there any example whereof they make more than concerning the changing of the Sabbath-day. Great, say they, is the power of the Church, since it has dispensed with one of the Ten Commandments!”
Yet according to our opponents The Council of Trent was dominated by a Synagogue of Jews! We should have read of Hellenistic Christianity being supplanted by Jewish influence, not Jewish doctrines such as the Sabbath and Circumcision, being supplanted by Hellenistic Christianity. Our opponents have it 180 degrees wrong!
“Eric Jon Phelps is a racist”
The word racist is a bible hating communist term first popularized by Communist organizations in the early 20th century and a famous Marxist, Leon Trotsky. In his 1930 work The History of the Russian Revolution, Volume 1, Chapter 1, page 5 we read,
“Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Marx remarked upon this theme: “In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them.” This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the “Racists.”
MLK was operating right off Engels’ Communist Catechism. Engels states in his The Principles of Communism 1847,
“— 22 —
What will be the attitude of communism to existing nationalities?
The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and thereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”
Racial integration was a direct sociological application of Marx and Engels’ views of Property. The Bible teaches racial separation in Gen. 9-11 and teaches the subjugation of the black Hamitic race.
That is not my interpretation, that is the exact wording of Jasher:
73:33 For Moses remembered how Abraham had made his servant Eliezer swear, saying unto him, Thou shalt not take a woman from the daughters of Canaan for my son Isaac.34 Also what Isaac did when Jacob had fled from his brother, when he commanded him, saying, Thou shalt not take a wife from the daughters of Canaan, nor make alliance with any of the children of Ham. 35 For the Lord our God gave Ham the son of Noah, and his children and all his seed, as slaves to the children of Shem and to the children of Japheth, and unto their seed after them for slaves, forever.
>>>EJP does not support the Israeli government. He supports the racial seed of Abraham’s right to the Land Yahovah gave to them. I see no way around his argument but the replacement theology of Catholicism.
“and an Israeli blood diamond trader”
>>>Can you show me the connection between Eric’s business and the De Beers company or any concrete crime? I don’t want your assumed categorical condemnation of an industry I want a connection to a particular crime and EJP’s business. I don’t see anywhere in the bible where it says you cannot sell diamonds. I just have never read that…
“Frank led a satanic heresy against Judaism, and the ones who have read the books and articles by Rabbi Antelman, Rabbi W. Gunther Plaut, Henry Makow, Cliff Shack, Dietrich Bronder and Chistopher Jon Bjerknes are well informed about the Frankist roots of Nazism, Fascism, Communism, Socialism and National-Socialism.”
So the conspiracy was against the Jews. Thank you! The origin of Communism was Catholic Monasticism. In the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia, in its article entitled, “Poverty” we read,
“The express vow of renunciation of all private property was introduced into the profession of the Friars Minor in 1260. About the same time another change took place; hitherto no limit had been placed on the common possessions of religious, but the mendicant orders in the thirteenth century forbade the possession, even in common, of all immovable property distinct from the convent, and of all revenues; and the Friars Minor of the strict observance, desiring to go one step further, assigned to the Holy See the ownership of all their property, even the most indispensable. Following the example of St. Francis and St. Dominic, many founders established their orders on a basis of common poverty, and the Church saw a large increase in the number of the mendicant orders until the foundation of theclerks regular in the sixteenth century; even then, many orders united common poverty with the regular clerical life: such were the Theatines (1524), whose rule was to live on alms and contributions spontaneously given; and the Society of Jesus (1540). It soon became evident that this profession of poverty which had so greatly edified the thirteenth century was exposed to grave abuses, that a certain state of destitution created more cares than it removed, and was not conducive either to intellectual activity or to strict observance; and that mendicity might become an occasion of scandal. Consequently the Council of Trent(Sess. XXV, c. iii, de reg.) permitted all monasteries, except those of the Friars Minor Observantines and the Capuchins, to possess immovable property, and consequently the income derived therefrom; but the Carmelites and the Society of Jesus, in its professed houses, continue to practise the common poverty which forbids the possession of assured incomes.”
Sir Thomas More’s Utopia 1516 continued the process. The Jesuits perfected communism in their Reductions in Paraguay. Even the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia admits in its article “Reductions of Paraguay”,
“(1) Conditions of Property
The economic basis was a sort of communism…The land and all that stood upon it was the property of the community. The land was apportioned among the caciques, who allotted it to the families under them. Agricultural instruments and draught-cattle were loaned from the common supply. No one was permitted to sell his plot of land or his house, called abamba, i.e. “own possession.” The individual efforts of the Indians, owing to their indolence, soon proved to be inadequate, whereupon separate plots were set aside as common fields, called Tupamba, i.e. “God’s property” which were cultivated by common labour under the guidance of the Padres. The products of these fields were placed in the common storehouse, and were used partly for the support of the poor, the sick, widows, orphans,Church Indians, etc., partly as seed for the next year, partly as reserve supply for unforeseen contingencies, and also as a medium of exchange for European goods and for taxes (see below). The yield of the private fields and of private effort became the absolute property of the Indians, and was credited to them individually in the common barter transactions, so that each received in exchange the goods he desired. Those abamba plots which gave a smaller yield because of faulty individual management were exchanged from time to time. The herds of livestock were also common property. The caballos del Santo, which were used in processions on festal occasions, were especially reserved. Thus the Reduction Los Santos Apostoles at one time owned 599 of these.”
Karl Marx was controlled by a Jesuit named Father Beck as Marx admits,
“Bismarck complained in his North German Gazette that I was in league with Father Beck, the leader of the Jesuit movement, and that we were keeping the socialist movement in such a condition that he could do nothing with it.”https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/bio/media/marx/79_01_05.htm
See also Joachim of Flora’s 3 Age prophecy,
its influence on Loyola,
“The nobility and populace must, by all methods, be persuaded into a belief that the Society was instituted by the particular direction of divine providence, according to the prophecies of the abbot Jachim, that by this means the church, though depressed by the attempts of heretics, may be raised again to its primitive luster.”
“His 1831 Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion show the influence of the mystic Joachim of Fiore, as well as certain structural correspondences to the thought of Boehme.”
and Hegel’s influence on Marx.
“I therefore openly avowed myself the pupil of that mighty thinker, and even here and there, in the chapter on the theory of value, coquetted with the modes of expression peculiar to him.”
See also the Jesuit Reductions.
Hendrie replied to me on email and complained that Judaism is not based on the Old Testament but the Talmud and Babylonian mysticism. The problem is which Judaism? Karaite Judaism exists specifically to reject the additions to the Tanach. And what of Nazarene Messianic Judaism which I am a follower of which does much the same? Maybe Mr. Hendrie simply does not know anything about Judaism? Thirdly, as I have proved, Judaism was defined by the Catholic Church as keeping the weekly sabbath, the seasonal Sabbaths, circumcision, etc. all elements of the Torah. Fourthly, can Mr. Hendrie show us where the Talmud forbids the keeping of the weekly sabbath, the seasonal Sabbaths, and circumcision?
Hendrie points to COCC 839 and demands that here is prima facie evidence that the Catholic Church absolves the Jews of guilt for rejecting Yeshua Messiah and acknowledges their salvation outside of Messiah. Catholic apologist R. Sungenis responds,
“R. Sungenis: What is “echoed”? That the Jews are the Chosen People? Hardly. Paragraph 839 of the Catechism never refers to the Jews as the Chosen People. In fact, it goes out of its way not to do so, since the first sentence says that the title only applies to “the Church” (i.e., “When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant…”). It then goes on to say that the “Jewish faith” was “a response to God’s revelation in the Old Covenant.” In other words, Judaism was the proper religion in the Old Testament, not a proper response to God in the New Testament.
Why was it a proper response only in the Old Covenant? The Catechism answers by quoting from Romans 9:4-5, for in the Old Covenant the Jews possessed “the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises…” Immediately following, the Catechism quotes the clause “for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable” from Romans 11:29, but it makes sure it first quotes “and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ” from Romans 9:5. The reason for this specific progression is simple: the Catechism does not want to confuse the issue by implying that the Jews still retain the legal rights to “the sonship, the glory, the covenant, the giving of the law, the worship” but only that Jews, who had such a rich spiritual heritage, should be the most likely ones to receive the “gifts and call” of salvation that he made “irrevocable” for them. Whether the Jews at large will take advantage of their rich spiritual heritage and turn to Christ is a question that St. Paul does not know. All he knows is that, at the end of time, God will have saved all the Gentiles and all the Jews He intends to save, and Paul refers to these as “the fullness of the Gentiles” and “the fullness” of the Jews or “all Israel” in Romans 11:12, 25-26.”
Hendrie maintains his allegiance to the Catholic trinity doctrine which he got straight from Rome while rejecting Rome as Jewish Mysticism:
“Lateran IV 1215 CANON 1
Text: We firmly believe and openly confess that there is only one true God, eternal and immense, omnipotent, unchangeable, incomprehensible, and ineffable, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; three Persons indeed but one essense, substance, or nature absolutely simple; the Father (proceeding) from no one, but the Son from the Father only, and the Holy Ghost equally from both, always without beginning and end. The Father begetting, the Son begotten, and the Holy Ghost proceeding; consubstantial and coequal, co-omnipotent and coeternal, the one principle of the universe, Creator of all things invisible and visible, spiritual and corporeal, who from the beginning of time and by His omnipotent power made from nothing creatures both spiritual and corporeal, angelic, namely, and mundane, and then human, as it were, common, composed of spirit and body. The devil and the other demons were indeed created by God good by nature but they became bad through themselves; man, however, sinned at the suggestion of the devil. This Holy Trinity in its common essense undivided and in personal properties divided, through Moses, the holy prophets, and other servants gave to the human race at the most opportune intervals of time the doctrine of salvation.”
Hendrie complains that I finger the Catholic Church as the problem and not the Jews yet seeing he sees the Catholic church dominated by Jews, how could he criticize me?
Hendrie next complains that the Jews were predominately responsible for the Atlantic slave trade which is also absolutely absurd. As I pointed out in my book on the South, the slave trade was created by the papal Bull Dum Diversas, and carried out by Portuguese and Spanish Catholics. The English Royal African Company was created by Catholic gentile James Duke of York. The first slave ship in America, the Desire, was built by the Gentile colony of Massachusetts in 1636. I’m sure Jews were involved in the slave trade but to say they were predominant is utter obstinacy.
[Dr. Robert Maryks “The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews: Jesuits of Jewish Ancestry and Purity-of-Blood Laws in the Early Society of Jesus”]
“BUT it really bothered me that if Judaism and it’s awful Talmud HATES Jesus AND His followers”
Wait you’re saying the Jewish converts into Christianity and the Jesuit order believed the Talmud? I showed above that in the Council of Trent the Jewish Jesuits clearly sided with Roman Catholic doctrine over Jewish tradition in toto.
“Also the fact that modern Judaism and Roman Catholicism BOTH are Babylonian Mysticism pretending to follow the Old/New Testament yet their rituals and traditions contradict it”
I bet you’ve never attended a single Orthodox Jewish Synagogue.
“What made no sense was to think that the jesuits/pope”
No, no. The Jesuits and the Pope had a fight in 1760s and 1770s resulting in Jesuit suppression in 1773. The Popes ever since 1814 are under the Jesuit boot pursuant to Joachim of Flora.
“who “supposedly hate Jews”
Which traditional Catholicism does, but the Jesuits hates traditional Feudal Catholicism pursuant to Joachim of Flora’s 3 Age prophecy. The Jesuit order sees Feudal Catholicism as being a Patriarchal Misogynist and Greedy perversion of their perception of the original Christians.
“would give them so much power and wealth and control over the banks, the media and Hollywood”
First, the protestant Reformation had decimated the power of the Papacy which showed not only at this time but even before, the papacy was not and is not omnipotent. Secondly, the Rothchilds for instance come into power in the late 18th early 19th centuries, exactly when the Jesuits continued to cripple the Papacy with the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars ending with their ultimate victory in 1814 with their formal reestablishment.
“I am going to show you that not only is this theory complete bunk nonsense that is popular primarily amongst crazies, nutjobs, Jews, and Jew defenders, but that the Jesuits are actually crypto-Jews. So even if this ridiculous theory were true, it would still mean that the Jews are and always have been behind this global criminal cabal. Who Promotes this Theory and Why?”
So where does Dr. Robert Maryks in his book prove that the Jews received into Jesuit Communion were Talmudists? Jewish Jesuits received Jesus/Yeshua and sided with Catholic doctrine over Jewish doctrine as I showed from the Council of Trent above. You cannot believe the Talmud and receive Jesus/Yeshua.
“One of the most devastating things to the notion that the Jesuits are at the top of this thing is the fact that more than a lot of the Jesuits are in fact Jewish. The Jesuit Order is in reality a Jewish Order masquerading as a Catholic one as a cover, so even if they were at the top it’s still a Jewish conspiracy. “We Jesuits take pleasure in admitting those of Jewish ancestry.” J. Nadal Morey”
The very quote you cited proves it is not a Jewish Order. First, notice the quote you cite is speaking from someone of non-Jewish ethnicity. If the original founding Jesuits were themselves Jewish, the quote should have read “We Jewish Jesuits take pleasure in admitting those of Gentile ancestry.” Moreover, I doubt very seriously if you even took 5 minutes to verify those citations. I did. The books Maryks is citing from are not written in English. Even the Wikipedia article of the author is not in English.
“An excellent resource documenting all the so called Jesuits who are really Jews turned Catholic, hence “crypto-Jews”, can be found at JewishJesuits.com.”
“The Jesuit Order in its founding was very much Jewish. All five of its founding members were Marrano Jews (i.e. Jews masquerading as Christians). Ignatius Loyola – Founder of the Jesuit Order (JEW)”
>>>>Nope. Ignatius Loyola’s family has been DNA tested and he was R1b not J1 or J2.
“Jewish infiltration of the Vatican stems back many hundreds of years, and it would be safe to say that the Jews have a strong vice-grip over that institution, from the inside out. One of the most blatant examples of the Jewishness of the Vatican is the fact that the Pope himself wears a fricken Yarmulke.”
>>>No they didn’t and the history of the Spanish Inquisition is a memorial of that fact. As for the Zucchetto the Catholic Encyclopedia states this stems back even to the middle ages before there was any Jesuit.
“It cannot be said positively when the zucchetto became customary, but it was probably not before the thirteenth century. It appears on the cardinals in the fresco, “St. Francis before Honorius III”, painted about 1290 in the upper church of St. Francis at Assisi. It is seen also under the tiara in the effigy on the tombof Clement VI (d. 1352) at La Chaise-Dieu. The figures on the several tombs of bishops of the fifteenth century in the Roman churches show the zucchetto under the mitre. In the “Ordo” of Jacobus Gajetanus (about 1311) the zucchetto is mentioned in connection with the hat of the cardinals (cap. cxviii), and with themitre in the “Ordo” of Petrus Amelii (cap. cxliv.), which appeared about 1400. It is shown in the pictures and sculpture of the late Middle Ages sometimes as a round skullcap, sometimes as a cap that covers the back of the head and the ears. In this shape it was called camauro; this designation was given especially to the red velvet cap of this kind bordered with ermine that was peculiar to the pope. There was great confusion as to the proper use of the zucchetto and hence the Sacred Congregation of Rites has delivered several decisions on the Subject (“Decr. auth. Congr. SS. Rit.”, V, Rome 1901, 382).”
“And whose to say that these Pedophiles and Satanists in the Catholic Church aren’t just crypto-Jews?”
>>>But that is for you to prove not for me to disprove!
“It is redundantly obvious that the Vatican is infiltrated and blackmailed by Jews which utterly puts to shame any notion that the “Jesuits” control anything let alone Israel and Jews. It’s the other way around.”
>>>Nope. Vatican II was Jesuit not Jewish. The Politics of Heresy: The Modernist Crisis in Roman Catholicism by Lester R. Kurtz states on page 182,
“Teilhard de Chardin [Jesuit] may be the one demonstrably explicit link between the modernists and developments at Vatican II, in that he was a close colleague and friend of Edouard Leroy.”
“So the Jewish Rothschild banking dynasty controls the Vatican treasure.”
>>>The encyclopedia did not say “controls.” It says “guardians.”
“If the Jesuits are so bad and evil than how do you explain Bishop Richard Williamson? Catholic Bishop (Jesuit) Richard Williamson is a great man who has valiantly publicly stated that 9/11 was a fraud, a lie, and that the holocaust was also a lie.”
He is not a Jesuit. He is an SSPX traditionalist Catholic. The very people targeted by the Jesuits after their suppression until their victory in 1814! The fact you do not understand this distinction between the Jesuits and their intention to suppress 2nd Age Traditional Feudal Catholicism, pursuant to Joachim, shows you know nothing about historical philosophy and Western History and especially Catholic History.
“Do Jesuits control the Media, own Hollywood, the Federal Reserve, and constantly inhabit high positions in government?”
Absolutely which is why we are not taught to keep the Sabbath and circumcise our children and eat clean, etc. Jewish laws, by the Media and Hollywood but to be atheists and savages. And which is why the federal reserve funded Hitler. And yes Jesuit trained Catholics run the government as I proved in great detail.
“Have Jesuits been expelled from 109 locations since 250 AD?”
>>>No, 83 countries since the 16th century!
“Jesuit Thomas J. Campbell, President of the Order’s Fordham University from 1885 to 1888 and again from 1896 to 1900, notes in his highly detailed history, The Jesuits, 1534 to 1921, that, between 1555 and 1921, the Order was expelled at least eighty-three times from countries, states and cities for engaging in political intrigue, subversive plots and treason against the state! By 1900, nearly all of Europe, Asia and South America had had enough of the Jesuit Order. Pope Clement XIV had suppressed the Company with a decree, first prepared as a Brief but then promulgated as Bull, in 1773; England had expelled it in 1579, 1581, 1586, 1602 and 1604;
Venice in 1606, 1612 and 1768; Denmark in 1606; Japan in 1587 and finally in 1614 (beginning the Edo Era, having executed 111 Jesuits by 1651; re-admitted in 1913); China in 1623 “for leading the ignorant people towards rebellion,” 1716, 1753, 1775 and 1783; India in 1623; Holland in 1596 and 1816; Malta in 1634 and 1768; Belgium in 1818 and 1826; Russia in 1723 (for which the Order poisoned Tzar Peter the Great), 1776 and “forever” in 1820; Spain in 1767, 1820, 1835, 1854, 1868 and 1932; Britain and Ireland in 1829, Portugal in 1598, 1759, 1834 and 1910; Switzerland in 1847; Bavaria in 1848; Italy in 1848 and 1873; Austria in 1769, 1770, 1772 and 1848; Paraguay in 1733 and 1852; Germany in 1872; France in 1594, 1606, 1764, 1804, 1806, 1831, 1845, 1880 and 1901; Guatemala in 1872; Mexico in 1859; Brazil in 1874; Argentina in 1841; Ecuador in 1875; Colombia in 1850 and 1875; Rome in 1872; Costa Rica in 1884; and Cuba and the Philippines in 1898 (resulting in the Order’s Spanish-American War).” Vatican Assassins III, Eric Jon Phelps, pg. 729. See also A Glimpse of the Great Secret Society
“Did Jesuits run the African Slave trade”
No, Catholic gentiles did as I demonstrated.
“instigate WWI & WWII”
So the Jews instigated their own genocide? Huh, interesting….
All the rest I go into detail on in my book on the South and my Jesuit Timeline.
Also, to dispella commn myth among these men John Calvin was not a Jew. he was born to a French Roman Catholic family. The classic work on Calvin’s Life, The Life of John Calvin by Thomas Dyer makes this very clear from primary sources beginning on page 4:https://archive.org/stream/lifeofjohncalv00dyer#page/n8/mode/1up
See also my well know interview with EJP to this issue:
and my documentaries:
As a p.s. I’m actually having these men claim that the Bible teaches Communism. That’s utterly ridiculous. The Southern writers were going through this in detail in the 19th century with the rise of Communism after 1848. See Discussions by Dabney, Vol. 3 second article, “Anti Biblical Theory of Rights”. He takes you line by line through the liberal ideas of equality and the eradication of caste and shows how the Torah utterly denied these ideas and upheld a caste system.