Truth Lies Out There Exposed

:26 What you quoted nowhere says he support the state of Israel. You are lying. Palestine from Latin Palestina (name of a Roman province), from Greek Palaistine (Herodotus), from Hebrew Pelesheth “Philistia, land of the Philistines.”

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Palestine&allowed_in_frame=0

Have you even studied who the “Palestinian” people are?

:48 They didn’t invent those parameters. That is what the Bible says: Gen. 15:18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates

1:24 This is straining out a gnat.

1:39 The United States Government is a communist terrorist military dictatorship that came to power in most of North America through invasion rape pillage and murder. It has no rights to rule or to tax whatsoever. Most of its wealth especially in the Northeast region has been stolen from southern and western states. Prescott Webb, Divided We Stand.

1:51 Total speculation. I have already proven the Government is controlled by Catholics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpLKAPOKDGM

2:05 Because the Bible says it explicitly in Gen. 1:14-20. 2:23 All you just did was give your baseless opinion Based on no facts or documents whatsoever! And you didn’t prove they were Talmudists. Most of those people don’t even have a beard much less Talmud observant.

2:35 Baseless speculations you want to be true. The documented fact is the Jesuits took over the Catholic Church in 1814. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14100a.htm

Restored after the Pope suppressed their order with Dominus ac Redemptor Noster showing clear dominance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominus_ac_Redemptor

Vatican II was Jesuit not Jewish. The Politics of Heresy: The Modernist Crisis in Roman Catholicism by Lester R. Kurtz states on page 182, “Teilhard de Chardin [Jesuit] may be the one demonstrably explicit link between the modernists and developments at Vatican II, in that he was a close colleague and friend of Edouard Leroy.”

2:41 So why did Israel give the Vatican its holy sites? And why did the Fed fund Hitler?

2:50 baseless speculation. You have proof for building 7 and that’s it.

3:00 Who benefited? Wars for the Catholics. Decorated Journalist Seymour Hersh exposes the Knights of Malta involvement in current and previous administrations in a speech delivered at Georgetown University January 17, 2011. See Transcript: the Obama/Bush Foreign Policies; Why Can’t America Change? at the Foreign Policy Blog. http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/01/22/transcript-the-obamabush-foreign-policies-why-cant-america-change/

I have already proved the Government is controlled by Catholics. My birth certificate, the basis for the fed’s income tax is littered with Catholic symbols not Jewish symbols. Anyway, in the other link I provided I refute every argument you people make. I am posing this comment to my blog.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Truth Lies Out There Exposed”

  1. Just to clarify: Is it your position that the Bible teaches that Jews have an indiscriminate, and unconditional claim to that specific area of land?

    If so: How did you deduce that from Gen 15?

    Thanks in advance for your time.

    Like

    1. That is such a disgusting manipulative question. What if I asked the Germans, oh, Is it your position that the Bible teaches that you have an indiscriminate, and unconditional claim to the German area of land? Or maybe to the Irish, oh, Is it your position that the Bible teaches that you have an indiscriminate, and unconditional claim to the Irish area of land?

      When the Jews were kicked out of their land for sin, the creator brought them back in Ezra and Nehemiah. Why didn’t he give them some land over here in America? Or maybe Sub-Sahara Africa? Could it be because it is their land pursuant to Gen. 15:18?

      Like

      1. First, I would like to apologize for being manipulative and dishonest.

        My concern is twofold: 1) That biblical nationalism is taking precedence over covenant obligations. For the Torah says that the land would vomit them out, as it did those before them. The land promises are tied to covenant faithfulness.

        2) Genesis 15 does not make unconditional promises to the Jews, it makes them to the seed of Abraham. You are obviously assuming that Abraham’s seed has been narrowed down to the descendants of Jacob (with which I agree), but you did not inform us of this assumption, nor why you believe the bible ends the “narrowing process” down at Jacob’s seed. I have in mind Gen 49 and the clear prerogatives given to Judah, and the consequences of the coming of Messiah.

        Basically, I believe this unqualified support for the modern state of Israel, whether it be for reasons of eschatology or biblical nationalism, is fundamentally at odds with scripture. It is an appeal to the promises of the creator to Abraham and his seed (which everyone agrees were not indiscriminate), while ignoring the covenant faithfulness required to retain the land, as the Torah states.

        I do not see you addressing covenant faithfulness and how this relates to the land promises; and I do not know to what else I should attribute this, except that your biblical nationalism seems to override your concern for the former.

        Finally, you speak many, many important truths, and it is not my desire to create animosity or antagonism. I simply wanted to get clarity on this issue, as the position you’ve taken seems to lack your characteristic rigor. Peace

        Like

  2. “The land promises are tied to covenant faithfulness.”

    >>>Not absolutely and Ezek. 36 explicitly denies it.

    Ezek. 36:21 But I had [i]concern for My holy name, which the house of Israel had profaned among the nations where they went. 22 “Therefore say to the house of Israel, ‘Thus says the Lord God, “It is not for your sake, O house of Israel, that I am about to act, but for My holy name, which you have profaned among the nations where you went. 23 I will vindicate the holiness of My great name which has been profaned among the nations, which you have profaned in their midst. Then the nations will know that I am the Lord,” declares the Lord God, “when I prove Myself holy among you in their sight. 24 For I will take you from the nations, gather you from all the lands and bring you into your own land.

    Notice he says ““It is not for your sake, O house of Israel, that I am about to act…I will take you from the nations, gather you from all the lands and bring you into your own land”

    Ezekiel’s prophecy explicitly states that their regathering is NOT “tied to covenant faithfulness” but to preserve the name of Yahovah! You are faced 180 degrees the wrong direction. Your position isn’t just a little off. If the truth is due south, you’re facing due north 180 degrees the wrong way. Not only does the bible not teach what you are saying, it explicitly addresses your position and explicitly rejects it.

    “2) Genesis 15 does not make unconditional promises to the Jews, it makes them to the seed of Abraham. You are obviously assuming that Abraham’s seed has been narrowed down to the descendants of Jacob (with which I agree), but you did not inform us of this assumption, nor why you believe the bible ends the “narrowing process” down at Jacob’s seed. I have in mind Gen 49 and the clear prerogatives given to Judah, and the consequences of the coming of Messiah.”

    >>>So why does Ezekiel call the land of Canaan, “your own land” is vs. 24? I understand that Israel functions as a type of the elect and that all who have faith in Messiah are Abraham’s seed, spiritually, Gal. 3:29. However, your replacement theology must be rejected:

    Rom. 9:3 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, 4 who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons, and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the temple service and the promises, 5 whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen.

    Rom. 11:I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? May it never be! For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew. Or do you not know what the Scripture says in the passage about Elijah, how he pleads with God against Israel? 3 “Lord, they have killed Your prophets, they have torn down Your altars, and I alone am left, and they are seeking my life.” 4 But what is the divine response to him? “I have kept for Myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.” 5 In the same way then, there has also come to be at the present time a remnant according to God’s gracious choice.

    There are still promises held out to these people as a distinct ethnic group. There is no denying it. And the great writers of the past understood it:

    https://southernisraelite.wordpress.com/2016/05/23/eschatology-amillennialism-and-replacement-theology-rejected-in-the-conversion-of-the-ethnic-jews/

    “Basically, I believe this unqualified support for the modern state of Israel”

    >>>I never said anything in support, unqualified or otherwise, of the current Government of Israel. As has been demonstrated by Chamish and others Israel’s Government is controlled by a Labor Zionist element that hates the religious Jews.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s