Second Reply to Axe of Perun, Renegade Tribune (Let’s see if he deletes it)

“Ah… the usual crap, I have to write an entire article every time a new “version” of you Christian lunatics appears.”

>>>A new version? Calvinism is the Protestant Reformation. It’s been around for 500 years. You are completely ignorant. This was sworn as the national covenant of the British people in the Solemn League and Covenant 1643 to which you are a traitor and apostate.

“As if the already 6 Christian Cuck articles and 2 CI articles weren’t enough – it would seem that now I have to not only answer all your claims, but also write one about “Calvinists”.”

>>>The scholars have already dealt with this.

Madison Grant, The Passing of the Great Race, pgs. 85-86

“In the Catholic colonies, however, of New France and New Spain, if the half-breed were a good Catholic he was regarded as a Frenchman or a Spaniard, as the case might be. This fact alone gives the clew to many of our Colonial wars where the Indians, other than the Iroquois, were persuaded to join the French against the Americans by half-breeds who considered themselves French-men. The Church of Rome has everywhere used its influence to break down racial distinctions. It disregards origins and only requires obedience to the mandates of the universal church. In that lies the secret of the opposition of Rome to all national movements. It maintains the imperial as contrasted with the nationalistic ideal and in that respect its inheritance is direct from the Empire. Race consciousness in the Colonies and in the United States, down to and including the Mexican War, seems to have been very strongly developed among native Americans and it still remains in full vigor to-day in the South, where the presence of a large Negro population forces this question upon the daily attention of the whites.

In New England, however, whether through the decline of Calvinism or the growth of altruism, there appeared early in the last century a wave of sentimentalism, which at that time took up the cause of the Negro and in so doing apparently destroyed, to a large extent, pride and consciousness of race in the North.”

“Perhaps I should do that for every single Christian idea that exists out there – there are, after all – just and only hundreds, even more, thousands of them. But, don’t worry – your version of it must be the right one.”

>>>No I am not a Christian. Calvinism is considered heresy by the traditional Churches. It violates the Trinity and Hypostatic Union doctrines among many others.

“Intellectually superior? Because you follow the Jew Book? Because you think you answered something? Why did you jump in case of Noah to 9:11, why didn’t you stay at 8 and finish the 8th chapter where a general idea of it is given in the “thought of God” – which should lead to a question itself – who the hell wrote what God thought in his Mind?”

>>>I answered your argument directly and plainly. You’re butt hurt and you’re trying to change the subject. You argued that the bible said God would never judge the world again when in fact it said he would never judge it again WITH A WORLDWIDE FLOOD. You know it. You know I know it and you’re being a butt hurt coward.

“1. The Ten Commandments were only for Jews. You see that it only refers to those who were sent out of Egypt and brought to the Land. It isn’t part of anyone else, neither are the remaining 600 Laws of the Torah.”

>>>You completely avoided everything I said which directly refutes this claim.

“2. All idol art is forbbiden in any shape or form. This goes even to the degree of destroying books and documents which are not part of it. You do remember that Christianity spread through Europe and destroyed its entire Culture, don’t you? This commandment alone is reason why Jesus himself was rejected by Jews. Read the fucking sentence”

>>>Again you avoided everything that I said.

“Or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
Any likeness.”

>>>Of God, not of anything.

“If you believe Jesus to be in heaven, then you may not have a graven image or any likeness of any thing of him.”

>>>You completely avoided the context of the passage. This is dealing with images of God.

“This includes Mary or any Saint.”

>>>No it doesn’t it includes images of God.

Leviticus 26:1
Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God.

“Even picturing God himself is not allowed.”

>>>No that is exactly and only what is not allowing.

Exo. 25: 18 And thou shalt make two cherubims of gold, of beaten work shalt thou make them, in the two ends of the mercy seat.
19 And make one cherub on the one end, and the other cherub on the other end: even of the mercy seat shall ye make the cherubims on the two ends thereof.
20 And the cherubims shall stretch forth their wings on high, covering the mercy seat with their wings, and their faces shall look one to another; toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubims be.
21 And thou shalt put the mercy seat above upon the ark; and in the ark thou shalt put the testimony that I shall give thee.
22 And there I will meet with thee, and I will commune with thee from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubims which are upon the ark of the testimony, of all things which I will give thee in commandment unto the children of Israel.

“3. The Bible rejects commitment to this earth – especially the New Testament. All materialism is denied, the entire family structure is told to be hated, your own life is told to be hated. There is a hidden message about meditation within it, but that doesn’t interest you. All the Saints were willing to die, even happy to die, because this life meant nothing to them. Read your early Christian fathers – they were all liberal lunatics.”

>>>No, those were your people. They believe in the soul and the monad and floaty place. Just like you.

“4. Yes, Jews destroyed all Monarchies. They admit it themselves :”

>>>Edward Hendrie is not a scholarly source nor a primary reference. Hendrie is a complete idiot. I have annihilated his entire platform.

The New Covenant fully enfranchises Gentile peoples:

Matt 21: 43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.

“5. Yes, the Bible forbids not only Gentiles to own Nations – it forbids Gentiles to exist. There are many verses within the Bible that speak of the annihilation of all the Goyim. All of them.”

>>>On the contrary:

Gen. 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of theearth be blessed.

“The Tower of Babel is a stolen text from Babylon – hence the name. It has nothing to do with the Jewish tribal God – especially since you even read there that “the Gods”, namely the Pantheon of Babylon, were “coming down”.”

>>>You are a liar sir. Gen. 11:5 says Yahovah, not the gods. And Gen. 11:7 also does not say the gods. It says Let us, referring to the Father and his pre-incarnate Word.

“If you wish to analyze it metaphorically, then yes, the Rulers (Gods) destroyed the population that was creating their own rulership idea. Which in case of Babylon would mean that Jews were creating a multi-cultural society in Babylon which the Babylonians tried to shut down.”

>>>Hahahahaha…you people never cease to amaze me how you will lie to your very last breath in order to avoid your errors. There is not a single point either directly stated or implied to promote that interpretation.

“Now, the Jews are re-creating their multicultural Babylon in Europe and hope that we won’t shut them down again.”

>>>Citation needed. The major influence behind internationalism in the last 2000 years is the Roman Catholic Church. Not the Jews.

“6. Jews do not regard Gentiles as humans. Jesus himself calls the Grek/Cannanite woman a dog. A dog is not a human. He compares her to an animal and to a slave that has to beg for help. The heathen, the gentile, is constantly attacked and slandered in the Bible – and God is being called to kill and destroy them.”

>>>I repeat:

Matt 21: 43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.
45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.

“The idea of Noahide Laws came about later on – reading the Bible you would never even get the idea of those Laws having anything to do with Gentiles.”

>>>You again completely avoided the argument.

“Are you going to tell us that you actually agree with Jews being superior and that you should be considered something less than they are and adopt their bullshit Laws and Rulership?”

>>>No. The kingdom was taken from them and given to my people. The Anglo Saxon Protestant peoples.

“It shouldn’t surprise us then that your Calvinist brothers were helping Jews throughout the history. You actually worship those bastards.”

>>>The following is from Rutherford’s Free Disputation (1649),

“Answ. Paul bids receive them, ergo, he bids tolerate them all together, it follows not, he will have them informed that there is no such divine law that presseth them, and so a moral toleration of not refuting their error is denied to them.

2. He bids receive them in a practice in itself, for that time, indifferent (for 1 Cor.8.8. Neither if they did eat, were they the better, nor if they did not eat, were they the worse) but only erroneous in the manner, because of the twilight and sparklings of the light of the Gospel not fully promulgated to the Jews. Will it follow that the Jews should be tolerated still, and perpetually to circumcise and keep the ceremonial law, and to teach others so to do? for Libertines contend for a constant and perpetual toleration of all Jewish and sinful practices.” (pg. 100)

“To tolerate Jews openly blaspheming Christ, or to receive them in the Common-Wealth, cannot be allowed, or to suffer them to have Synagogues, in regard they blaspheme the God we are in Covenant with, and do no less deny him, than Goliah and Senacharib did, 2. But simply seduced Jews are to be instructed, for there is a peculiar prophecy touching the Jews, Rom. 11. Jer. 50. 5 ,6. That they shall be brought in to know Christ, and believe in him.” (pg. 316)

“7. I don’t care what your specifically idiotic branch of Christianity says about it.”

>>>Your ignorance of the Solemn League and Covenant and thus the British peoples shows how much you hate the British peoples.

“If you believe that he died for ALL sins and that he actually battled over death and won it for ALL people – then there can’t be any Sin anymore.”

>>>Which he didn’t. He died only for the elect. You know I answered you directly. Your pride is hurt and you’re butt hurt.

John 17: 9 I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine…19 And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth.

“8. And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s sake; for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done. While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.”

>>>And I never said that the earth is coming to an end. I never said that. Citing this passage actually destroys a lot of your criticisms of the bible.

“9. You are an idiot for abandoning your European heritage and culture.”

>>>The whole concept of a pan European heritage and culture is a liberal internationalist idea. I am loyal to the nationalistic heritage of the Southern people, namely the protestant reformation to which you are a traitor.

“10. Lev. 19:17 talks about Israelites only you god damn baboon. The entire Book up to Paul the Jew who brought Christianity to Gentiles is entirely – just and only – for Jews.”

>>>Gen. 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

Matt 21: 43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.
45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.

“If you wish to apply that to all other nations – then you immediately make it Universal.”

>>>That is putting the verse on its head. Establishing Nationalism among all peoples is universalism? Wow, you’re a pretty confused guy aren’t you? Paul tells us the law of moses is holy just and good and thus worthy of emulation.

Rom. 7:12 So then, the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.

“And Paul, the Jew, has brought to you a Universal fucking Christianity. Gentiles are to be Universal, Jews Jews.”

>>>No, Nationalistic Messianic Judaism. Christianity is the heritage of you pagans. Recently Thulean perspective even admitted it.

“11. You must not have noticed all the Banks in Gentile nations that are being run by Jews, hm?”

>>>No, actually I spent months studying through that and the vast majority are not. If the Jews run the banking system Lehman Brothers should have been bailed out in the crash of 2008.

“For the LORD your God will bless you as He has promised you, and you will lend to many nations (goyim), but you will not borrow; and you will rule over many nations (goyim), but they will not rule over you.
You fucking moron.”

>>> Matt 21: 43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.

“12. Hence why Jews rejected Jesus and gave him to the Gentiles.”

>>>Wrong, Jesus rejected the Jews and gave himself to the Gentiles. Matt 21:43-45

“ Your mind just can’t comprehend that Jews CREATED, DESIGNED, ON PURPOSE – this entire story to brainwash idiots like you. You just can’t comprehend that fact. If Jesus said to you TODAY : Sell all you have and follow me!, you’d do it. We both know you would. Nowhere does this imply that it was only to be applied during his “life”. If you wish to be a true disciple, hell even an apostle of him, you gotta follow the Jewbook. You aren’t doing it, so fuck off.”

>>>>I answered this directly and you completely avoided it you lying coward.

“13. Start fights among them? YOu killed them.”

>>>ROFL!!! What an effeminate diversion that was. You know you’re trying to start fights among white people. You knew I exposed your hypocrisy and you’re butt hurt.

“You killed your own brothers for Jesus throughout the centuries. And don’t give me the “but we Calvinists are different” bullshit.”

>>>Actually you people invaded my ancient home land of England with your Viking invasions so don’t even begin with me on this line.

“Your Protestant Reformation in the end created ZOG nations. Let that sink in for a moment.”

>>>Citation needed. The protestant reformation created Western Nationalism with the Treaty of Westphalia you complete ignorant fool. You know nothing.

“14. So they said, “Look, Lord, here are two swords.” “That is enough,” He answered.
Yeah, they armed themselves to the fucking teeth.
Do not Resist Evil, man. The other cheeck thing is basically irrelevant after that statement.”

>>>No it isn’t. It is a distinction between being patient with insults and defending yourself from fatal attacks. Yours is the same mentality as the SJWs who claim to be persecuted because someone disagreed with them on twitter.

“15. Again, if you wish to connect it only to Israelites, it applies only to them.”

>>>I can play that game too. If that is true then the turn your other cheek passage only applies to Israelites too doesn’t it? Did you not see that coming? Are you so stupid you do not predict what your opponent is going to say? This is why I refer to you as my intellectual inferior. I’m humiliating you in front of all your buddies.

“I believe I mentioned the same thing in some of my articles as well. If you are a Gentile Christian, you should only read Paul. He gave you the “Gentile” version of Christianity.”

>>>Paul was very clear that he was not creating a new religion but continuing and fulfilling the ancient Abrahamic covenant and said that the law of Moses is good and a standard for life.

Rom 7:12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

“16. Do to others as you’d want them to do to you? Where is “Torah justice” mentioned here? Nowhere, you made it up.”

>>>Mat. 5:17 17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

“17. Astro-theology is in the Bible my friend. Chakras and Kundalini are also. Egyptian mythology is. Sun worship of various kinds are. The Jews themselves had synagogues with the Zodiac in them.”

>>>Again, you completely avoided everything I said. I cited an article I wrote specifically on the issue and you completely avoided it you coward. One synagogue had that. One.

“Early Christian churches had them.”

>>>Citation needed.

“You can google and find them. It is all made up bullshit.”

>>>Google? LOL!

“The entire Bible is made up stolen material.”

>>>This is the ground where you guys show just how confused you are. Is it Jewish or is it paganism stolen? Which one? If it’s stolen from paganism then what is the problem? Aren’t I simply observing the pagan religion under another name?

“From Babylon, from Egypt, from Sumeria, from Assyria, from Greece. You have no idea my friend. You have no idea.”

>>>LOL……….keep telling yourself that. I have studied those issues more than anyone you have ever met. We didn’t steal from you. You stole from us.


One thought on “Second Reply to Axe of Perun, Renegade Tribune (Let’s see if he deletes it)”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s