Jared Taylor(Peace be upon him) “You Stole America from the Indians”

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Jared Taylor(Peace be upon him) “You Stole America from the Indians””

  1. The fact that Indigenous indians stole land from other people isn’t a good justification. Two wrongs don’t make a right. i mean if he’s going to argue that invasion of another groups is justified on the basis of whether that group obtained their land without theft involved, then he has no basis to complain -because it’s just survival of fittest right!. Especially because jared ( I assume) doesn’t have a theistic understanding of rights.

    Like

  2. Yes ! exactly my point, which is why jareds complaint is invalid – do you agree?. However driving out pagans is only justified if God has given you right over the land eg. Canaanite conquest numbers 34:1. It’s ironic that the supplanters where themselves pagans(trinitarians).

    Like

    1. No it wouldn’t because as the Torah clearly shows pagan savages have no rights.

      “However driving out pagans is only justified if God has given you right over the land eg. Canaanite conquest numbers 34:1.”

      >>>Citation needed. Deut. 18 makes very clear that the reason why the Pagans were drove out of the land of Canaan was not simply to make room for the Jews. It was because of their pagan religion.

      Deut. 18:12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.

      I wouldn’t call Trinitarians who do not take the implications of the Trinity to its full pagans.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. “No it wouldn’t because as the Torah clearly shows pagan savages have no rights.”

    >>>Citation needed.In a previous reply i said “theistic understanding of rights” i realize that using the word “rights” isn’t the most accurate term,the bible shows we (Torah follower or pagan) have no rights, Isaiah 64:8, deut 32:39 – so instead ill use wrong and right.

    “Citation needed. Deut. 18 makes very clear that the reason why the Pagans were drove out of the land of Canaan was not simply to make room for the Jews. It was because of their pagan religion.
    Deut. 18:12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee..”

    >>> your correct about the reason for the conquests, what i was trying to say was it is only right or wrong to supplant pagans if god has directly spoken or commanded an individual to carry out his will eg. joshua 6:1-3 , “And the Lord said to Joshua, See, I have given Jericho into your hand, with its king and mighty men of valor. You shall march around the city, all the men of war going around the city once.”

    Like

    1. “Citation needed”

      >>>I gave the citation but because as a Christian your churches have brainwashed you to hate the bible, you dismissed it.

      “In a previous reply i said “theistic understanding of rights” i realize that using the word “rights” isn’t the most accurate term,the bible shows we (Torah follower or pagan) have no rights. Isaiah 64:8, deut 32:39 – so instead ill use wrong and right.”

      >>>Nothing in this verses says anything about human beings having no rights. The scriptures make very plain that we have both duties and rights. The two are linked.

      Exo. 21:10 If he takes to himself another woman, he may not reduce her food, her clothing, or her conjugal rights.

      Isa. 10:2 So as to deprive the needy of justice And rob the poor of My people of their rights, So that widows may be their spoil And that they may plunder the orphans.

      If it is the duty of the wife to serve the husband it is ipso facto the right of the husband to be served. If it is the duty of husbands to provide for their lawful wife it is then ipso facto the right of the wife to be provided for.

      “your correct about the reason for the conquests, what i was trying to say was it is only right or wrong to supplant pagans if god has directly spoken or commanded an individual to carry out his will”

      >>>Citation needed. Case examples are ground for future policy even if the case did not explain it such. For instance when the master Yeshua states:

      Matt. 12:1 At that [a]time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath, and His disciples became hungry and began to pick the heads of grain and eat. 2 But when the Pharisees saw this, they said to Him, “Look, Your disciples do what is not lawful to do on a Sabbath.” 3 But He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he became hungry, he and his companions, 4 how he entered the house of God, and they ate the [b]consecrated bread, which was not lawful for him to eat nor for those with him, but for the priests alone? 5 Or have you not read in the Law, that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple [c]break the Sabbath and are innocent?

      To make such a rule you are making is to attribute arbitrarity to the creator and a commitment to nominalism.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s